Giles Gray

Joined 9 years ago

• started 8 topics
• posted 345 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Giles Gray

• 
  114

  Evidence for a Young Earth

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  9 years ago

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  9 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  I just had a quick look and the last mention of the 49K belief was the Warchtower, January 1st 1987 Questions from readers.

  That's got to be embarrassing...

  Link +1 / -0
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  Ok ........I am bending over .........waiting for the first rear - gunner to attack me !

  (Cough...Blush) well, I'm no 'rear gunner', but I will say that I am very appreciative that someone took the time to challenge me on my false perspectives whilst a JW.

  Indeed it is true that we were all wrong when we were in the organization, but then some of us were in such a religion because we prized truth.

  In this respect we haven't altered. We are now much better informed but with the addition of finding our voices after a long imposition of silence. It would be a shame to waste our hard earned freedom and not be able to challenge obvious falsehoods.

  Link +2 / -0
• 
  114

  Evidence for a Young Earth

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  9 years ago

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  9 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  Perry

  The 49,000 years of creation was last promoted in the literature as late as 1987 I believe.

  I don't think today they specify an allotted time for each day. They just say that each period was a long period of time.

  When they have got more specific, like in the publication 'The Origin Of Life', they have used the estimates of science, although they don't specify they believe such estimation as true.

  However you look at it, be it six literal days or six long periods of time, none of it stacks up to what science has discovered. The bible's account is incorrect, plain and simple.

  
  

  Link +2 / -0
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  Cofty

  In my Evolution is a fact series I have had countless insults and personal attacks by christians. I never retaliate. When you have the facts on your side why would you?

  I agree.

  Link +5 / -0
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  NotNew

  Creationists use science and logic and evidence?

  I wish. Would be far better sport.

  Link +3 / -0
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  On the other hand, the Bible presents information to the contrary, AND answers the all-important question that evolution cannot: Whence evil?
  

  And that proves it true does it?

  If you haven't thoroughly studied the evidence is it any wonder why you don't understand why things have taken such a long time.

  
  

  Link +5 / -1
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  Yes, but Forrest Gump was a bit dim, so he didn't have much to say. You don't have that excuse.

  Link +6 / -2
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  snowbird

  I vaguely remember reading an article by Neil deGrasse Tyson and being disappointed that he doesn't believe in Creation.

  So you've never really given evolution a fair chance because of your wish to believe in creation?
  

  Link +9 / -1
• 
  90

  New DNA Study Confirms Noah

  by notsurewheretogo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  9 years ago

  http://www.icr.org/article/9325/.

  amazing read...go on , have a laugh if you want to.. new dna study confirms noah.

  by brian thomas, m.s.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  5 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  snowbird

  That shows, Sir, what I thought of them.

  Actually, it shows you didn't read them objectively, if at all.
  

  Link +6 / -1
• 
  114

  Evidence for a Young Earth

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  9 years ago

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  for additional information:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 

  9 years ago
• 

  Giles Gray 9 years ago

  snowbird

  Just throwing it out there

  The only place you should throw such rubbish is in the bin

  Link +3 / -0